data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58817/58817e0e3b2c79f5ae3c8f0e6f4d98bc1d0699a0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e36f8/e36f88747f30ec86c56806fa26e04f468c83913a" alt=""
A vertical mouse? A Fiber optic table cloth (BALLIN' SON!) Indiana Jones 4? I actually thought he would look terrible, turns out Harrison Ford is timeless like the character...
Some techie stuff, some sci-fi stuff, some political stuff and a few things that aren't any of those three. Don't take me or yourselves too seriously.
What does it mean to attach a "paint gun mark" to a car? That sounds vaguely like "shooting a car with a paint gun." That's remarkably unsafe for a device that's supposed to save lives. Can it successfully detect if the user has his window rolled down or his convertible top down? Will it miss pedestrians? Damage the car?
And what makes you think that an "EMP gun" can properly localize its effect to disable only the cell phone while leaving the vital elecronic components of the car intact? Not to mention that an EMP pulse doesn't temporarily disable the phone, it destroys its circuitry. No more phone. Have they done any studies to see if a badly timed EMP makes the battery catch fire in the users hand?
And hey, what about the users complying with hands-free laws? They must get their phones fried too, since I'm fairly sure there's no way to distinguish between the two modes of operation aside from, yep, you guessed it, looking at the user.
This is about 17 terrible, halfway thought out ideas. Either April Fools day came late this year or this is a company that really likes the concept of bankruptcy.